Gov. Gary Locke takes a turn at the periscope aboard the Trident submarine USS Alabama at Subase Bangor on Friday, Nov. 21.  Locke was accompanied by Navy Rear Adm. Len Hering, commander of Navy Region Northwest, and Rear Adm. Mel Williams, commander of Bangor’s Submarine Group Nine. Locke also visited Naval Station Bremerton, NUWC, Keyport, and Puget Sound Naval Shipyard - Photo by Johnson Controls
Photo by Johnson Controls
Gov. Gary Locke takes a turn at the periscope aboard the Trident submarine USS Alabama at Subase Bangor on Friday, Nov. 21. Locke was accompanied by Navy Rear Adm. Len Hering, commander of Navy Region Northwest, and Rear Adm. Mel Williams, commander of Bangor’s Submarine Group Nine. Locke also visited Naval Station Bremerton, NUWC, Keyport, and Puget Sound Naval Shipyard

Navy may merge Bremerton, Bangor bases


July 4, 2008 · Updated 11:26 AM 

  • 0
  • Print Story
  • Letter/Editor

It was a no-brainer, really.

Two vital Kitsap County Navy bases have been operating as separate entities from the day they opened.

Why not merge the 5-year-old Naval Station Bremerton and 26-year-old Naval Submarine Base Bangor into one super-base with a new name and two annexes?

A merger could save money on command redundancies, so Navy top brass is considering the idea. The proposed merger would save millions of dollars per year in efficiencies to put both bases — about eight miles apart — under one administration.

If approved, about 40 military and civilian jobs would be eliminated.

Rear Adm. Len Hering, commanding officer of Navy Region Northwest, said the Navy is considering eliminating the command at Naval Station Bremerton and place it under the Bangor command.

The command will go to Bangor because of its superior and long-standing infrastructure, said Lt. Anne Cossitt, assistant public affairs officer for Navy Region Northwest. Subase Bangor came into existence in February 1977.

The marriage will likely be known as Naval Base Kitsap, with annexes at Bremerton and Bangor, Hering said.

Although no one other than command staff are being looked at as being laid off, the Navy will continue to examine redundancies in the formerly separate bases. That could lead to layoffs in the future.

“Our Navy has been experiencing change at a tremendous rate over the last few years,” Hering said.

“From the Pentagon to the deckplates, we are having to reassess the way we do the Navy’s business.”

Never before has the need to become efficient and effective been so paramount, he added.

He said the change is closely related to Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Vern Clark’s vision.

This vision, called Sea Power 21, sees the Navy as having the technology, agility, firepower and people to meet challenges of the 21st century, said Hering.

“What this comes down to is providing our sailors and Marines with the tools to fight a war and win,” he said.

Overall, the Navy’s goal is to save about $10 billion per year to build up the fleet.

Bangor’s submariners and Bremerton’s surface-ship sailors serve different missions, but top brass see no complications arising.

Layoffs won’t occur until 2004 — mostly from the Navy. DoD and the Navy will assist personnel in finding new positions.

The proposal is still being reviewed by the secretary of the Navy. The Navy is reportedly trying to save the $40 billion over the next four years to add to the current 295 ships.

The possible merger action is separate from the Pentagon’s base realignment and closures (BRAC) being dictated by Congress in 2005.

“We need to continue to determine what changes make sense for this region. We need to look at adopting models that have proven successful elsewhere, Hering said. “We must all be prepared to embrace the challenges associated with creating the very best and most cost-effective organization possible.”

Comment on this story.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in our online community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. In a nutshell, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

So keep your comments:

  • Civil
  • Smart
  • On-topic
  • Free of profanity

We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please refer to our Terms of Use for full detail on participating on our site.

blog comments powered by Disqus