Opinion

In our opinion: Good call on revision to ADA service animal rule

It sounds like the beginning of a tasteless joke, a person walks into a Value Village with a hamster and claims that it is a service animal.

But those who depend on service animals other than dogs aren’t laughing at recent changes to the American Disabilities Act which designate canines, almost exclusively, as the only animals protected by the act.

That means that those who rely on animals besides dogs wouldn’t have the law on their side if they wanted to bring their animals into public places.

It’s not easy to tell somebody that their iguana, or ferret, or, in one case, a hamster, isn’t allowed. Especially when a person depends on that creature. As one person in reporter Kristin Okinaka’s story this week noted, if the animal helps the person, they should be allowed to go where the person goes.

But as an animal expert said in the story, dogs can be trained to help in every way any other animal can help.

In the interest of public health and safety, the new rule will ensure the law is not being abused.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Read the Nov 28
Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Browse the archives.

Friends to Follow

View All Updates